What criteria do moderators of "Ask Slashdot" use to accept or reject questions?
I wanted for ask the Slashdot community what they thought would be the next cross platform filesystem that could be adopted for things like still cameras, video cameras, portable players, flash drives etc...
Currently FAT16, and FAT32 are it. But with hard drives being put into video cameras by the likes of JVC, I can see even FAT32 being inaqeuate in the next couple of years. Also there was quite a bit of concern about FAT(16/32) patents earlier this year. So what new filesystem supportable by embedded devices, windows, OSX, *nix's and linux etc, that isn't patent or license encumbered could possibly be used, or will we see a Filesystem standards war. There is currently wide spread support for a single filesystem standard ensuring interoperability, I would hate to see it become fractured with proprietary solutions.
I thought this was actually a very reasonable and topical question, but it was summarily rejected without any indication why. (I am probably not in the "Slashdot in" crowd ;-)